Header photo source: Donald Trump’s official website.
President-elect Donald Trump has filed a request with the US Supreme Court to delay enforcement of a law that mandates TikTok’s Chinese parent company, ByteDance, to divest its US operations by January 19 or face a nationwide ban. This move, submitted in an amicus brief on December 29, comes ahead of the pivotal January 10 hearing, which could decide the app’s fate in the country.
The law, passed in April with bipartisan support and signed by President Joe Biden, highlights national security concerns over ByteDance’s ownership. While Trump had advocated for banning TikTok outright during his presidency, citing risks of Chinese government access to US user data, his latest filing reflects a shift. According to Reuters, he now seeks to delay the law’s enforcement, urging a “political resolution” under his administration and emphasizing the importance of addressing tensions between free speech and national security.
Trump’s new stance follows a December meeting with TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew, where he acknowledged the app’s utility for connecting with younger voters—a marked departure from his earlier attempts to bar the platform.
TikTok in the crosshairs
With over 170 million US users, TikTok’s influence is undeniable, but its Chinese ties have drawn bipartisan scrutiny. Supporters of the divest-or-ban mandate argue that ByteDance’s ownership structure poses inherent risks of Beijing’s undue influence, despite ByteDance’s insistence that no data-sharing with Chinese authorities occurs. The company has introduced measures, including US-based data storage, to alleviate concerns.
ByteDance has filed legal challenges against the mandate, arguing it violates First Amendment protections and relies on speculative risks. A panel of federal judges upheld the law earlier this month, but TikTok has appealed to the Supreme Court. The upcoming hearing will be a critical juncture in determining whether the app can maintain its US presence.
Trump’s move adds an unexpected layer of complexity to the case. His amicus brief does not take a position on the law’s merits but argues that delaying enforcement might pave the way for compromise. Beyond the specifics of TikTok, the Supreme Court’s decision could set precedents for tech governance, national security, and free speech.
TikTok’s legal challenges bring into focus broader debates about the US government’s ability to regulate foreign-owned tech platforms. A decision favoring ByteDance could restrict government oversight, while upholding the law might embolden similar regulatory actions against other foreign companies.
RELATED ARTICLE
The geopolitical chessboard
The TikTok saga mirrors the ongoing economic rivalry between the US and China. Washington’s actions against ByteDance resonate with its broader efforts to curb Chinese tech dominance, echoing tensions over trade imbalances and IP disputes. Beijing’s longstanding restrictions on US platforms such as Facebook and Google further underscore the reciprocal nature of these conflicts.
TikTok’s widespread appeal, particularly among younger Americans, complicates the issue for policymakers. A ban risks alienating this demographic, a consideration likely influencing Trump’s call for delay. His softened stance appears to balance national security concerns with political optics, reflecting the challenges of navigating this contentious issue.
The legal battle’s outcome will ripple far beyond TikTok. A ruling against ByteDance could embolden regulators to increase scrutiny of other foreign-owned platforms operating in the US, while a compromise might prompt these companies to adopt proactive compliance measures. Regardless of the result, the decision is poised to reshape how nations navigate the crossroads of digital sovereignty, innovation, and security.